FANDOM

Superdadsuper

Councilor Bureaucrat
  • I was born on October 18
  • My occupation is Witness of the Bible and its truths
  • I am Male

My name is Superdadsuper and I'm an Admin and Bureaucrat (means I manage other Administrators) here at Bible Wiki. If you have questions about the site please ask me here. If you have a question about the Bible please ask on the Bible Questions Forum so I can answer it in a better format

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • I started doing an outline for Mark but the last section (H7) refuses to appear. If you look at it in source mode you'll see it but it won't appear once you exit source mode.

    Also, is the level of detail OK for the synopsis so far? Or is it too detailed? It's more detailed than one commentary I have but about the same as the New Bible Commentary.

      Loading editor
    • This is likely an error with the template for the outline. I am not sure whether or not we really need a template for outlines. I personally am not too concerned about outlines. I looked at the source code a little bit and I was unable to determine what would be causing the problem (I even removed the templates below to see if they were intefering somehow). 

      In regards to detail- Bible Wiki encourages in depth information and comprehensive coverage of biblical topics. This would include a detailed synposis of the Gosepl of Mark, as it pertains to Mark itself (not just a general retelling of Gospel history but the specific elements of the narrative important to Mark itself). 

        Loading editor
    • The reason why it is broken is because the outline template currently goes upto 6 main sections. While you can add more than 6 sections, only the first 6 will appear. For the sake of the article it is being used on, I can easily add the next section (and likely will add up to Section 10)

        Loading editor
    • All done. That took me about 20 minutes. The template has 10 headings, with each heading having 26 sections, and each section having 5 subsections.

      Edit
      I just checked the Gospel of Mark article, and the 7th heading is visible.
        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • You deleted Raphael because you think it is non canon it is actually canon in Catholic and Orthodox Bible so it is actually canon so you deleted something that is canon and you are being a very poor administrator.

      Loading editor
    • I am composing a message on your wall now explaining this, don't worry I don't delete things without explaining. You will see the message within the next 15 minutes. 


      In Christ,
      Superdadsuper, Bible Wiki Administrator and Bureaucrat 18:35, July 16, 2017 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • It better be good seriously that is just stupid that you deleted something you don't understand. I did a lot of reasearch and took a lot of time to make that.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • It seems that I have come across this particular place during my time here on the Wikia, and it seems to be have piqued my interest.

    Other than the Holy Bible, are there any other required text that must be read before making contributions here on this Wiki?

    Apologies in advance, but my location (Alberta, Canada) is from a place where the Bible and its scriptures do not have significant influence, thus I may not be considered a true Christian, according to your standards here on the Wiki. Would there be any way for me to make positive contributions here on this Wiki?

      Loading editor
    • View all 6 replies
    • It depends. Life outside of this wiki has been busy for me, as I am working, as well as contributing towards a different Wiki.

        Loading editor
    • Ah, okay. Well let me know if you plan on contributing more or have any other questions related to this wiki or matters of the Bible or Faith.


      In Christ,
      Superdadsuper, Bible Wiki Administrator and Bureaucrat 23:20, July 11, 2017 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • The person who posted before me vandalised that page, and I was wondering why it wasn't protected. 

      Loading editor
    • Thanks for letting me know- this was simply an oversight error. I am very aware of the vandalism incident, please make sure to ignore him and do not engage him. 

      If you have any feedback about that page or the other "About" pages I would appreciate it, especially on the Disclaimer.


      In Christ,
      Superdadsuper, Bible Wiki Administrator and Bureaucrat 22:39, June 17, 2017 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I see that your an administrator on this Wiki! Just wanted to stop by and say "Hi" before I start editing! I am a fan of the local celebrity in a small town of Indiana named, Cam Monroe (hence the name!), you should hear him sometime! Well bye! This Wiki looks great by the way!

      Loading editor
    • I am looking forward to you contributing here. Bible Wiki strives to be a comprehensive and in-depth encyclopedia of the Bible, that covers all its content from a Biblical Point of View. While there are many good Bible encyclopedias out there, there are none as comprehensive nor as good on search engines as Wikipedia is in its content. However Wikipedia is very liberal and in their attempt to be "neutral" it creates the gateway for the secularization of the Bible.

      While this wiki has been around for some time we have a very strong lack in editors in content. We do have a few comprehensive articles, but for the most part our content is very "sprinkled" (content in lots of different areas, but not one topic is covered very well). RIght now we are trying to focus our efforts on the Pentateuch, particuarly on the Book of Numbers for the month of March.

      While anyone can edit on Bible Wiki we can only expect Christians to productively contribute to our mission overall. If you would be interested I would love to join you in chat sometime to talk a bit further about our goals and how you can get started on writing. A large problem we have found in the Wikia audience is lack of a good familarity with the Bible, which causes many new users to be uncomfortable with writing (they are afraid they don't know enough). Bible Wiki creates a unique opportunity to both Study and Write about the Word of God, simantenously.


      In Christ,
      Superdadsuper, Bible Wiki Administrator and Bureaucrat 20:36, March 13, 2017 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • It's nice to meet you, Superdadsuper, I'm new here and I'm glad to be contributing to this community! See you around! ;)

      Loading editor
    • Hi, welcome to Bible Wiki- you certainly reached out to the right person. Happy Purim!

      I am looking forward to you contributing here. Bible Wiki strives to be a comprehensive and in-depth encyclopedia of the Bible, that covers all its content from a Biblical Point of View. While there are many good Bible encyclopedias out there, there are none as comprehensive nor as good on search engines as Wikipedia is in its content. However Wikipedia is very liberal and in their attempt to be "neutral" it creates the gateway for the secularization of the Bible.

      While this wiki has been around for some time we have a very strong lack in editors in content. We do have a few comprehensive articles, but for the most part our content is very "sprinkled" (content in lots of different areas, but not one topic is covered very well). RIght now we are trying to focus our efforts on the Pentateuch, particuarly on the Book of Numbers for the month of March.

      While anyone can edit on Bible Wiki we can only expect Christians to productively contribute to our mission overall. If you would be interested I would love to join you in chat sometime to talk a bit further about our goals and how you can get started on writing. A large problem we have found in the Wikia audience is lack of a good familarity with the Bible, which causes many new users to be uncomfortable with writing (they are afraid they don't know enough). Bible Wiki creates a unique opportunity to both Study and Write about the Word of God, simantenously.

      In Christ,

      Superdadsuper, Bible Wiki Administrator & Bureaucrat

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I saw an article that had an icon that was for ranking a page's quality. Perhaps we can do something similar here. We can use Template:Icons to do this. What do you think?

      Loading editor
    • My short response is "No". We don't need any more templates at this point, too many templates bog articles down and can cause portability issues (make sure you design some of your templates more portably please, they cause lots of bugs and mobile issues).

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Could you add Template:Testament Label Icon to this mediawiki page? Add it like this:

    * Template:Testament Label Icon
    

    What it does is adds that template to the Templates tab in the editor sidebar. It is a shortcut to adding it to an article, so that instead of typing out the name of it, a user can easily apply it.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Enough said. You could shoot me a message on my wall. 

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Here is the code I was talking to you about in Google Hangouts:

    #WikiaArticle {
     display: block !important;
     overflow: visible;
    }
    
    This needs to replace
    #WikiaArticle {
     display: inline;
    }

    on MediaWiki:Wikia.css. The Testament Label Icon template is currently broken and the code above will fix it along with another issue I noticed.

      Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.